Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Two questions of paramount importance: my comment |
|||
Line 169:
::Those proposals are still being drafted and have not been formally proposed yet. It would be premature to ask that people take a stance on them. -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 23:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
:::Nevertheless, the matters being addressed are very serious. I would certainly appreciate knowing the views of of ArbCom candidates on these issues. --<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky|HK]]</font></font> 16:28, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
:Well, I have replied in the appropriate place. These are counter-manifestoes, aren't they? They are moving targets, since the draft may be changed without notice. They are about tying the ArbCom's hands, not about making it more effective. I hope they are not taken too seriously. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] 16:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||