Content deleted Content added
Pi Delport (talk | contribs) →Material deleted from "Carl Hewitt, the Actor model, and the birth of Scheme": I can only repeat what has already been said. |
Pi Delport (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 56:
: I can only repeat what has already been said.
:* You keep alleging the existence of a controversy, that Sussman and Sussman claimed that actors were "lambda calculus in disguise" (and later "backed off" from this in later publications), when in reality, from the very first Scheme memo, they were very clear and specific about the lambda calculus's shortcomings compared to the actor model, in contradiction to
:* You keep pointing out one or other feature of Scheme that does not resemble the actor model, completely ignoring the fact that ''they were never intended to''.
:*# The lack of cell and serializer actors, as discussed above, was intentional and explicitly noted.
Line 63:
: I don't know what point you're trying to make with ActorScript paper quote, as it either accidentally or deliberately misquotes AIM-349 without necessary context: the attempted correction, that lambda calculus cannot model the concurrency expressed in the actor model, is in fact exactly what AIM-349 states itself!
: As a last point: if you truly care about this topic, '''[[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|please consider registering accounts]]''' , as it is difficult to hold a conversation with an unknown number of anonymous parties.
: <span style="white-space:nowrap">—[[User:Piet Delport|Piet Delport]] <small>([[User talk:Piet Delport|talk]]) 2009-11-05 21:
| |||