Content deleted Content added
On one hand, Scheme incorporated re-invocable continuations that go beyond Actor message passing. On the other hand, Scheme did not provide for message arrival order that is part of Actors. |
Pi Delport (talk | contribs) →Material deleted from "Carl Hewitt, the Actor model, and the birth of Scheme": this is getting way past tedious |
||
Line 71:
It seems very strange. On one hand, Scheme incorporated re-invocable continuations that go beyond Actor message passing. On the other hand, Scheme did not provide for message arrival order that is part of Actor message passing. [[Special:Contributions/68.170.176.166|68.170.176.166]] ([[User talk:68.170.176.166|talk]]) 22:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
: You're repeating yourself, i'm repeating myself... i still see no evidence for any "controversy", and still do not think you entirely understand the text you're quoting (as i explained above).
: If you want to opine about what you perceive as being strange about Scheme's design choices, you can do it on your user page, a blog, or similar: Wikipedia is '''[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|not]]''' for personal commentary or opinions. <span style="white-space:nowrap">—[[User:Piet Delport|Piet Delport]] <small>([[User talk:Piet Delport|talk]]) 2009-11-12 21:05</small></span>
| |||