Talk:History of the Scheme programming language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
material referenced above should also be included
Line 77:
::According to work published at the time referenced above and also including [http://publications.csail.mit.edu/lcs/pubs/pdf/MIT-LCS-TR-154.pdf Semantics of Communicating Parallel Processes] [http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/6272/AIM-410.pdf?sequence=2 Viewing Control Structures as Patterns of Passing Messages] [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=512975&coll=portal&dl=ACM Synchronization in actor systems], the following controversies were prominent in the initial development of Scheme:
::*hairy control structure ''versus'' Actor message passing
::*EVALUEATE1UNINTERRUPTABLYEVALUATE!UNINTERRUPTEDLY ''versus'' message arrival ordering
::This is what "'''Hewitt is flaming about.'''" [Sussman and Steele 1976] But now, on the basis of no evidence, you claim that the controversy nevery happened.[[Special:Contributions/99.29.247.230|99.29.247.230]] ([[User talk:99.29.247.230|talk]]) 19:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)