Talk:Go! (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 151:
:::: "The two inline references I removed (TripCom and SOA4All) make no mention of Go!, and I have absolutely no idea what relevance they have" - again, why not ask on the talk page? You simply do not assume good faith. First I'm accused of being Frank, now you're accusing me of being a spammer. No? [[User:BarryNorton|BarryNorton]] ([[User talk:BarryNorton|talk]]) 21:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
:::: "The Erlang reference only mentions Go! in a footnote" - you mean mentions it thus ''by name'', I suppose? (I mean, when the alternative is that you're simply lying.) You have an occasional 'academic bias' but you're unaware that academics very often refer to one another simply by citation (and that citing an article about Go! in the body text of an introduction to a paper ''is'' citing Go!) [[User:BarryNorton|BarryNorton]] ([[User talk:BarryNorton|talk]]) 21:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
::::: I quote: "'''3 Agents’ Architecture''' As proposed in [3] and [4] agents are implemented as groups of communicating processes. [...] [4] K. L. Clark and F. G. McCabe. Go! for multi-threaded deliberative agents." [[User:BarryNorton|BarryNorton]] ([[User talk:BarryNorton|talk]]) 22:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)