Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Sam Spade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Question from Alabamaboy: clarify response |
→Question from Alabamaboy: clarifying response |
||
Line 174:
:Sam's continuing insults? None here I can see. Please don't undelete the Rfc, which I had put a spedy delete on (or was somehow involved in the process) and needs to be seen in the light of the Rfc for Felonious Monk. I would remind you that Rfc's on editors not endorsed within 48 hours are subject to speedy deletion, and that you have no reasonable cause to undelete this one, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 15:24, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
That's why I didn't undelete it. And to me, the fact that Sam Spade immediately said I was trolling by raising this issue is insulting.
However, the greater point I raised here were the insults referenced within the RfC. In addition to calling [[User:FeloniousMonk]] an asshole [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFeloniousMonk&diff=19513782&oldid=19494467], Sam Spade evidently admitted to sending this e-mail by Wikipedia's e-mail function: :Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:36:29 GMT
:To: "FeloniousMonk" <thurstonhowellsrevenge@XXX.com>
| |||