Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Sam Spade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Question from Alabamaboy: Sam Spade other insults (including ruling by Arbitrators) |
|||
Line 200:
:Which one, we've mentioned 2 or 3 RfC's now ;) [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 16:40, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm glad he worked out the issue with [[User:FeloniousMonk]] and I never said he made racist insults. However, the fact that he responds to my concerns by insultingly stating "How you became an admin in so little time, w so few edits is beyond me" suggests to me that he should not be an arbitrator. In addition, to say "I have already admitted to making the occasional slip of the tongue every 5,000 edits or so" is not a defense. That's like saying I'm not a criminal because I only break the law every now and then.
However, the ealier issues I raised are not the only personal attacks Sam Spade has engaged in. For example, in this [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Nobs01 and others|very recent arbitration]], the arbitrators found by a 7 to 0 vote that "Sam Spade has made personal attacks on Cberlet [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cberlet&diff=prev&oldid=15584503] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Political_correctness&diff=next&oldid=13498444]." As a result of this finding, Sam Spade was cautioned to avoid personal attacks. All of this evidence shows a pattern of insults which continues to this day. As a result, Sam Spade's ability to be a fair arbitrator should be questioned.--[[User:Alabamaboy|Alabamaboy]] 16:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||