Revision as of 22:23, 7 January 2010 edit ShadowRangerRIT (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 5,025 edits Wikifying,including additional information from Microsoft and switching to inline references. Refs are poor (Microsoft's TFAT and TexFAT pages are near carbon copies), but better than nothing. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:21, 16 January 2010 edit undo Guy Harris (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 79,988 edits →Limitations: Copyedit. Next edit →
Line 10: == Limitations == Due to the lack of support in desktop [[operating system]]s, ~~both~~neither ~~forms~~form of TFAT ~~are not~~is recommended for removable media. While the desktop OS could still read the drive, it could not use the transaction-safe features, so unexpected removal or a power outage could lead to data loss. In addition, directories created under the desktop OS may not be transaction-safe even if the drive is later attached to a TFAT aware OS.<ref name=MSTFAT /> == References ==

Transaction-Safe FAT File System: Difference between revisions