Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/AntonioMartin: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:15, 5 January 2006

Revision as of 02:16, 5 January 2006

Line 32:

--<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky|HK]]</font></font> 16:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

==Further Questions from [[User:-Ril-]]==

:''The following questions are for each candidate, and do not specifically target you''

''Do you hold any strong political or religious opinions (e.g. concerning George Bush, Islam, or on which end you should break a boiled egg)? If so, would you recuse yourself from cases centred on these?''

''How willing are you to contest the decisions of other arbitrators rather than just "go with the flow"?''

''Do you view all requests to re-address cases, particularly requests made by those most penalised, as being automatically without merit?''

''In the case against Yuber, it was decided by the arbitration committee that it is the duty of arbitrators to investigate, and rule on the behaviour of not only one party involved, but all of them. Do you support this decision?''

''Do you believe that regardless of Jimbo Wales' own views on the matter, the community should be able to strip arbitrators of their position under certain circumstances, and if so, what circumstances?''