Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:41, 6 January 2006

Revision as of 17:44, 6 January 2006

Line 183:

:'''If'''... and only if... I was somehow convinced that ArbCom would be somewhat streamlined and made so that the Arbitrators don't grow grey hairs, then I would consider reentering the ArbCom race. [[User:Linuxbeak|Linuxbeak]] (drop me a [[User_talk:Linuxbeak|line]]) 17:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

::It would be nice if the pool of arbitrators was large enough that breaks hashad minimal effect. For example, if there were 3 panels, each with 5 arbitrators, the ArbCom would be 3x as efficient. If there were 20-25 arbitrators in the pool, a few being on break or otherwise inactive wouldn't cause any harm. Allowing for ample "time-off" might encourage more users to run for ArbCom. [[User:Carbonite|Carbonite]] | [[User talk:Carbonite|Talk]] 17:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)