Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Anglius (talk | contribs)
m reply
Talrias (talk | contribs)
Jtkiefer question
Line 195:
: A candidate's statement can be as long or as short as he or she likes. Obviously, too long and it gets ignored; too short and it doesn't give enough information. [[User:Talrias|Talrias]] ([[User_talk:Talrias|t]] | [[Special:Emailuser/Talrias|e]] | [[Special:Contributions/Talrias|c]]) 18:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
:I thank you, Mr. Jenkinson.--[[User:Anglius|Anglius]] 20:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 
== Jtkiefer question ==
 
I asked my questions in the approperiate subpage (above link) but Jtkiefer removed it. Look at the history you can find the question. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Candidate_statements/ Jtkiefer&oldid=34177766] {{unsigned|OceanSplash|03:55, 7 January 2006}}
 
: It's up to him which questions he answers; if you are unhappy that he did not answer your question then you can vote against him when the election starts, and possibly leave a comment saying that he chose not to respond to your question. [[User:Talrias|Talrias]] ([[User_talk:Talrias|t]] | [[Special:Emailuser/Talrias|e]] | [[Special:Contributions/Talrias|c]]) 03:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)