Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Dmcdevit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Neutrality question and Censuring questions from -Ril-: further answers |
→Recusal, Code of Conduct, Expansion: final answer here |
||
Line 107:
4. Have you voted over at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Proposed modifications to rules]]? If not, why not? If so, please summarize your votes.
:I haven't. First, let me stress that [[m:voting is evil]]. I firmly believe that polls hinder discussion and consensus-building. Having said that (and I see that I made one comment there in August) I honestly wasn't that concerned with what form this selection process was decided to take. I figure Jimbo, straight election, or in between will get us a mostly reasonable ArbCom (even if I'm not there). Having spent a lot of time working on a more than a few cases now, I can tell you most of it's just drudgery and patience. :-) [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 07:52, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind consideration of and answers to these questions. —[[User:Nrcprm2026|<i>James S.</i>]] 06:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||