Content deleted Content added
Mindmatrix (talk | contribs) newest comment to bottom |
|||
Line 1:
== Ogg hosting website ==▼
With only Dailymotion listed, the list seems to forget about a few sites: ▼
such as, the internet archive. ▼
example: [http://www.archive.org/details/Abandonedhorrorcolor] ▼
When it's opened in Firefox (version 3.6), I get the following text under the preview and embed this:▼
<blockquote>▼
Your browser supports the new <video> tag!▼
Would you like to try the new <video> tag?▼
</blockquote>▼
There must be other sites as well experimenting with the video tag? ▼
Most will work with a fall back of course but anyway, support is support. ▼
Or should we have a special section where it says: sites experimenting with HTML5 video tag? ▼
<br />--[[User:Thelennonorth|Thelennonorth]] ([[User talk:Thelennonorth|talk]]) 13:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)▼
== HTML comment left on the page ==
Line 66 ⟶ 51:
The section entitled "Motivation" reads as original research (or opinion) and offers only one reference, that being to a demo of the Ogg format being referenced in a <video> element. I submit it really needs help or removal.
[[User:Alphaman|Alphaman]] ([[User talk:Alphaman|talk]]) 00:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
▲== Ogg hosting website ==
▲With only Dailymotion listed, the list seems to forget about a few sites:
▲such as, the internet archive.
▲example: [http://www.archive.org/details/Abandonedhorrorcolor]
▲When it's opened in Firefox (version 3.6), I get the following text under the preview and embed this:
▲ <blockquote>
▲Your browser supports the new <video> tag!
▲Would you like to try the new <video> tag?
▲</blockquote>
▲There must be other sites as well experimenting with the video tag?
▲Most will work with a fall back of course but anyway, support is support.
▲Or should we have a special section where it says: sites experimenting with HTML5 video tag?
▲<br />--[[User:Thelennonorth|Thelennonorth]] ([[User talk:Thelennonorth|talk]]) 13:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
|