Talk:Dynamic programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:27, 25 February 2010

Revision as of 17:48, 3 March 2010

Line 13:

* Acute ? It's statically + dynamically typed.

* Self-modifiable assembly language ?

== Criteria ==

Line 33 ⟶ 34:

=== Interpretation ===

Lisp is dynamic. Lisp can be compiled. Is that a good-enough counter-example ? I must admit that I don't know enough about the internals of Lisp compilation. [[User:Yoric|Yoric]] 16:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Lisp, Scheme, Dylan and lots of other "dynamic" languages are regularly compiled to assembly, C or other lower level presentation. IMHO the issue is not about compiling or interpreting, both of which are ambigous terms in themselves. [[User:TokenLander|TokenLander]] ([[User talk:TokenLander|talk]]) 17:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

=== Dynamic typing, type annotations ===