Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mondrian programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:28, 14 March 2010

Revision as of 23:57, 14 March 2010

Line 13:

:::That's true, the article certainly needs some work, but we're not here for that, we're here to establish notability. Do the sources do that? <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font>^{[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]} 04:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Sorry, but the cited sources do not cut it; all are self-published, or not independent, or do not give significant coverage; most miss the mark on all three counts (if they are about this language at all, and not about some other homonymous product). &nbsp;--[[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]] 23:16, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

*:[http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:u2mUQY-mq2gJ:citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.44.9509%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf+%22Mondrian%22+programming+language+Utrecht&hl=en&gl=us&sig=AHIEtbRp-xjp8bJaEwY1kIs7KTvCcS-8Kw The Design and Implementation of Mondrian]

*:Might I ask what is wrong with this source? <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font>^{[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]} 23:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

*::Seeing as this is a paper by the designers of the language, this source would seem not to be quite "[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]] of the subject" as required by our [[WP:general notability guideline|general notability guideline]]. &nbsp;--[[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]] 23:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)