Talk:Extensible Authentication Protocol: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Merge proposal: fixed my copyedit
assess
Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=C|importance=|network=yes|network-importance=}}
{{diagram needed|Security protocols are inherently difficult to understand. Diagrams are helpful.}}
 
==Untitled==
This page seems to have some serious anti-Cisco slant, possibly to the extent that it violates NPOV. In particular, phrases such as 'Swallowing the Cisco Kool-Aid' have no place in an encyclopdiac entry. Yes, it is true that LEAP as well as MD5 are vulernable to dictionary attacks; however, this article makes such the assinine references that EAP-FAST is likewise going to be insecure which is true speculation and also has no place in this entry. --anon
: Thanks for pointing that out: I've cut a few sentences that were blatant, but it still needs work, and the article is pretty hard to understand to boot. I've added a "cleanup" tag. [[User:Matt Crypto|&mdash; Matt <small>Crypto</small>]] 16:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)