Revision as of 22:48, 2 April 2010 edit Cnorvell (talk \| contribs) 22 edits →AllegroGraph ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:29, 4 April 2010 edit undo Bejnar (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 53,642 edits →AllegroGraph: keep Next edit →
Line 29: [[User:Cnorvell\|Cnorvell]] ([[User talk:Cnorvell\|talk]]) 22:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC) *'''Keep''' the references listed in Google Scholar seem to indicate more secondary source recognition than for most software. The fact that some of it is quite depreciating, doesn't lessen its notability. After the Afd, assuming that it is kept, editors should try to avoid blog sources. Also they should strive to put at least the lead paragraph in plain English without jargon or acronyms. --[[User:Bejnar\|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar\|talk]]) 06:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllegroGraph: Difference between revisions