Revision as of 18:55, 6 April 2010 edit M4bwav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,367 edits →The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:57, 6 April 2010 edit undo M4bwav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,367 edits →The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten Next edit →
Line 4: == The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten == I'm willing to bet whoever wrote the majority of the article has a vested interest in the success of CSLA, the article is practically sales literature. The article doesn't give any objective and useful perspective of the subject matter, itthe article should be removed or rewritten.[[User:M4bwav\|M4bwav]] ([[User talk:M4bwav\|talk]]) 18:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture: Difference between revisions