Revision as of 00:30, 19 January 2006 edit TDC (talk \| contribs) 8,719 edits →necessity of weasel words? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:37, 19 January 2006 edit undo Commodore Sloat (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 13,928 edits →necessity of weasel words? Next edit →
Line 1,030: : Sorry, but for far too many people what comes out of the NY Times is very much contested, especialy on the Niger urainum deal. [[User:TDC\|DTC]] 00:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC) ::Sorry, but that doesn't respond to the point here. If you have a published contestation of a specific claim, that's great for wikipedia. If you don't, adding weasel words based on your assumption that "far too many people" agree with you is silly. Shall we put "it is claimed that George W. Bush is president" or "it is claimed that bats navigate using echolocation" simply because such things are published in the new york times?--[[User:Commodore Sloat\|csloat]] 00:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq/Archive 5: Difference between revisions