Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Louisiana Baptist University people (second nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 255:
*'''Keep'''. I was brought here, like many others by Wiggins2, or as he wants to be called, "Wiggie". I think we shouldn't be so quick to shoot him down, as I, & probably many others, are grateful for his post to draw our attention to this subject. I wouldn't mind if the other "side" did the same. But we cannot ignore the fact that this is defintely going to open wikipedia into two halves; Those who want to keep. Those who don't. I.E. Christians, & others. However, this should not be about religion. I would be ashamed of the christians on here if they only voted to keep the articles because they were christian orientated. This should strictly be business as usual, even though it does seem strange an editor would nominate so many christian articles. Maybe a hidden agenda? If an article's crap, then it should be deleted. Being an inclusionist, I will probably keep the most mundane article. However, the list of notable people list is like many others, & should not be here. To do so would be obvious bias. I ask everyone to not be drawn in with a strict "You're wrong, I'm right" situation, but be open & find a way to keep peaceful.... [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 04:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC). BTW, I hope my vote isn't discounted, I count myself as a influencial editor...
====Wiggins2====
Click the link and learn [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Wiggins2] [[User:Jim62sch|Jim62sch]] 02:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||