Revision as of 00:26, 25 June 2010 edit CBM (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 55,390 edits move new comment to bottom and respond ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:40, 2 November 2011 edit undo 129.67.127.65 (talk) Add new section as a request for clarification of "indicies of computable ordinals" Next edit →
Line 44: :It is true that the page doesn't use the word "alternating", but I think the definition here is correct. Is there something in particular wrong with it? — Carl <small>([[User:CBM\|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM\|talk]])</small> 00:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC) == "Indicies of Computable ordinals" == It is unclear what the indicies of computable ordinals are. See the discussion at http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/72826/complexity-of-the-set-of-computable-ordinals. It may refer to recursive well-orderings of <math>\omega</math> or to Kleene's O notation. If it is Kleene's O, there should be a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleene%27s_O. Either way (or if it is both and these are equivalent statements), this should be clarified

Talk:Analytical hierarchy: Difference between revisions