Revision as of 03:17, 29 January 2006 edit Geni (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 38,623 edits →Someone with tact needed ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:20, 29 January 2006 edit undo Mais oui! (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 111,268 edits →User removing British: There is absolutely no case for intimidating new Users with blocks: that is totally unreasonable Next edit →
Line 966: I am an ignorant American but I thought in one traditional sense British was sometimes used to refer to the pre-Anglo-Saxon inhabitants of the island of Britain, especially the Welsh, Scots and non-Danelaw areas of England, as in the context of Arthur as the quintessential Briton. Is this not a recognized inclusive usage? [[User:Alteripse\|alteripse]] 03:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC) English, Scottish and Welsh are the standard descriptors. "British" is ambiguous and politically-charged; and considered offensive/pejorative, or at least inaccurate, by many people. There is absolutely no case for intimidating new Users with threats of blocks: that is totally unreasonable.--[[User:Mais oui!\|Mais oui!]] 03:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC) ==Block of [[User:Kmac1036]]==

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions