Talk:Process modeling: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:37, 6 July 2010

Revision as of 12:47, 12 October 2010

Line 1:

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=

{{Sys ratingWikiProject Systems|class=Start |importance=high |field=Scientific modeling | nested=yes }}

}}

Line 6:

;Please sign your comments with the Wiki code <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your comments!

"Process modelling" is also a term used by chemical/process engineers to refer to their efforts to model chemical processing plants. BPM should therefore be specified fully, not shortened as in the present article. {{unsigned2|00<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:21,Signatures|unsigned]] Augustcomment 23,added 2006by [[User:129.94.6.30|129.94.6.30]] ([[User talk:129.94.6.30}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/129.94.6.30|contribs]]) 00:21, August 23, 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

:I do not see why, the chemical processing plant is still a business, and as such the modelling of its workings fits within the business process modelling paradigm. [[User:Ansell/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Ans<span style="color:#009000;">e</span>ll</span>]] 07:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Please note that the process modeling for process engineering refer to mathematical models which mimics the actual process. For example, a process model for a blast furnace (used to make steel) would capture all the physico-chemical reactions and try to predict the temperature and completion of various reactions during the charge descent. This is surely not a business process modeling. {{unsigned2|12<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:04,Signatures|unsigned]] Septembercomment 13,added 2006by [[User:219.64.92.39|219.64.92.39]] ([[User talk:219.64.92.39}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/219.64.92.39|contribs]]) 12:04, September 13, 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

:If this is true, the article surely does not reflect any of what you said (no mention of chemicals, blast furnaces, steel making, or tempature) and only refers to how it's used in a ''business''. [[User:Radagast83|Radagast83]] 20:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Line 21:

: Update to the comment above. There are not two articles. There is one article and a redirect. --[[User:Nickmalik|Nickmalik]] ([[User talk:Nickmalik|talk]]) 16:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

::There should be no redirection. Process Modelling and Business process modelling are in some way similar, but they are no way the same. Please leave them separated. {{unsigned2|09<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:25,Signatures|unsigned]] Aprilcomment 11,added 2007by [[User:82.131.44.226|82.131.44.226]] ([[User talk:82.131.44.226}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/82.131.44.226|contribs]]) 09:25, April 11, 2007</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

: Update to the comment above. The request was to keep things seperate that are not, in fact, seperate. I interpret this to mean "seperate these" things --[[User:Nickmalik|Nickmalik]] ([[User talk:Nickmalik|talk]]) 16:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

:::Business Process Modeling or BPM is the currently accepted nomenclature for business-specific modeling exercises. While process modeling can be executed for anything, there are specific challenges present when working within in the business arena. It would be of benefit to the business community to address those specifics here. {{unsigned2<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:VSJMortensen|VSJMortensen]] ([[User talk:VSJMortensen|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/VSJMortensen|contribs]]) 13:08, April 18, 2007|VSJMortensen}}</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

'''It is not the same.'''' Keep the subjects separate. They are realy not the same.