Revision as of 09:20, 15 July 2010 edit 195.235.227.10 (talk) Does XPS add any value to the current PDF standard or is just another monopolistic movement from Microsoft? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:21, 15 July 2010 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,858 edits m Signing comment by 195.235.227.10 - "Does XPS add any value to the current PDF standard or is just another monopolistic movement from Microsoft?" Next edit →
Line 23: ::::This line of text about not supporting the dynamic elements of PDF is all I wanted to know, I came here for this, just a quick reminder of the practical difference between XPS and PDF. It definitely should not be taken out, it's pretty significant and it's totally NPOV.--[[Special:Contributions/24.37.141.122\|24.37.141.122]] ([[User talk:24.37.141.122\|talk]]) 15:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC) So, do you guys know if XPS adds any value to the existing PDF standard, or XPS is just another monopolistic movement from Microsoft? If this is just a monopolistic movement from Microsoft it should be cited in the article. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.235.227.10\|195.235.227.10]] ([[User talk:195.235.227.10\|talk]]) 09:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ==Conversations about Why==

Talk:Open XML Paper Specification: Difference between revisions