Revision as of 22:27, 16 July 2010 edit Yaris678 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 12,470 edits →Examples: FAQ? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:45, 17 July 2010 edit undo Charles Matthews (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 367,952 edits →Other sites: add something to get this draft done? Next edit →
Line 12: ::Not really. There are some good lecture notes for the standard introductory graduate-level courses, but which ones are good is very much a matter of taste. The same goes for print textbooks; people go around in circles for ages about which ones are better than others. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM\|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM\|talk]])</small> 21:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC) :::You know what would be really useful? A site with reviews of a wide range of maths text books. [[User:Yaris678\|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678\|talk]]) 23:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC) ::::The essay looks otherwise fairly complete to me now, so perhaps we could just add a short list of definitely useful sites for now. [[User:Charles Matthews\|Charles Matthews]] ([[User talk:Charles Matthews\|talk]]) 19:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC) == Categorising what we are doing here ==

Help talk:Using Wikipedia for mathematics self-study: Difference between revisions