Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) →Remedies: reply |
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) new question |
||
Line 17:
::If something very urgent comes up, yes, but it is more likely that time will be spent pushing the case forward rather than dealing with existing requests for motions and injunctions. You can look at previous cases to see when injunctions and motions were applied - they tend to be used rarely. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 03:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
:[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion#Interim actions|Discuss this question]]
==Preparing for discussion of the proposed decision==
What, if anything, should be done to prepare for discussion of the proposed decision? (This question is for clerks and arbitrators to answer here, though everyone needs to discuss this). [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 00:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
:[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion#Preparing for discussion of the proposed decision|Discuss this question]]
| |||