Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
JohnWBarber (talk | contribs) →Polargeo discussion on the Proposal talk page: nag, nag, nag |
JohnWBarber (talk | contribs) Added the link for NW's question; per Scotty Berg's request, just to be a good wikicitizen |
||
Line 35:
Could a Principle be added to the proposed decision indicating what the Arbitration Committee's position on properly established community General Sanctions is in relation to the March 2010 motion quoted above? If ArbCom considers them to be essentially the same thing as Arbitration Discretionary Sanctions, then could perhaps Request for Enforcement of General Sanctions and Arbitration Enforcement be merged into a single noticeboard? '''<font color="navy">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 18:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
:See below. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 21:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
::Here: [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion#Inviolability of General Sanctions|Discuss this question]] -- [[User:JohnWBarber|JohnWBarber]] ([[User talk:JohnWBarber|talk]]) 21:35, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
==Polargeo discussion on the Proposal talk page==
| |||