Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/General discussion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) →Voting on PD/Closure Timeline: response |
|||
Line 57:
The proposed decision is a complex document prepared by multiple people that will affect many editors. As I noted last night, I have no intention of voting on findings and remedies until there is an opportunity for editors to comment on the proposals, and although I did vote on the principles, those votes too are subject to modification based on input that may come in suggesting difficulties or improvements. Although for various reasons it took us longer than expected to post the proposed decision, I do not, and I don't believe any arbitrator does, believe that the way to mitigate that is by rushing to a conclusion now. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 01:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
:Will the arbitrators actually read the comments being made at the proposed decision? I can't see ''any'' indication that the arbitrators took the Evidence and Workshop pages into account when formulating the PD. The PD in its current form could easily have been put together before the case even started, saving everybody a lot of trouble and acrimony. [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 02:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
| |||