Content deleted Content added
m →Wrong Languages: fix header level |
m fix header levels |
||
Line 60:
Ocaml is statically typed, at compile time, and by most purposes very "static" language. I think we can conclude that the lack of visible type annotations doesn't make any difference when deciding how "dynamic" a language is. [[User:TokenLander|TokenLander]] ([[User talk:TokenLander|talk]]) 17:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
==Characteristics of dynamic programming languages==
Line 74:
Closures are a way of creating new functions at runtime - in that sense they are related to dynamic compilation. Macros in Lisp can be seen as a run-time extension to the interpreter / compiler.
==Advantages==
* Dynamic programming languages are generally somewhat easier for newcomers to programming, in large part because they need not understand the system of annotations referred to above in order to write programs
Line 86:
[[User:Yoric|Yoric]] 14:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
==Rewrite==
I just started this rewrite, but didn't have time to finish it. I leave the text here in the hope it's useful in a future version -- [[User:ciphergoth|ciphergoth]] 20:05, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
| |||