Wikipedia:Phase II feature requests/Interface and user preferences: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Links to non-existent entries should be colored instead of using a question-mark
one case where question-mark links is better than colored, but agreement in general that it would be nice
Line 4:
 
Requests for what goes on outside of the entries--the menubars up top and bottom, etc., user preferences.
 
 
* Currently links to entries which do not exist are formatted with a question-mark at the end. This looks unprofessional, similar to old WikiStyle, and distracts from the text. Cascading style sheets offer the possibility to have links in a color other than the ones defined in -body-. It would be nice to display, by default or as an option in the preferences, links to non-existing entries in a different color, e.g. green. If there are problems with the implementation, please add a note here and I'll try to create an HTML example.
** This should probably be a configurable option, since people using a text browser may not be able to see coloured links -[[Bryan Derksen|BD]]
 
 
* Can we have the "edit this page right now!" link back at the top of the page? Or was that voted down? I like it.
 
** I second the above -- [[GWO]]
 
 
* I second the above -- [[GWO]]
 
 
 
* I would like a link somewhere to my own personal page, since there I have linked pages that are of interest to me (in lack of a 'subscribe' feature =). I always search for my own page the first thing when I surf to wikipedia.
 
 
 
* I would like to have a CANCEL Button on the Edits page (Page in Edit mode) added to the two existing ones SUBMIT and PREVIEW. Just to have a clear understanding what is going on and what the system/database is up to. [[StefanRybo]]
Line 26 ⟶ 19:
 
*** It would be helpful if the spell checking also check for variations of Wiki links, such as "Recent Changes" vs. "[[Recent Changes]]". It can eliminate branching of similar pages.
 
 
 
* Automatically update the present (server) date. Link the date to that day's page.
Line 34 ⟶ 25:
 
* When I'm editing a topic, I'd like to have the search box available at the bottom of the page. [[Janet Davis]]
 
** Suggestion: have the search results appear in a new window, so you don't lose whatever it was you're working on. -- [[Gimbo]]
 
 
 
* Making the "redirected from" comment at the top of each page an option which is by default off, not on. This feature would clean up wikipedia pages for casual users, and leave the nuts and bolts visible to people who wish to track down the offending <nowiki>OdDlyCapitaliZed</nowiki> links, etc. Of course (if I may say so) ;-) for this option to work, the caching problem would first have to be resolved. --KQ
 
 
 
** Under this scheme, how could we ever visit the redirection page? By switching a preference? I dunno, seems like we have to edit redirection pages too often. This would just create confusion, wouldn't it? --[[LMS]]
Line 48 ⟶ 43:
 
 
* A way to do doublecolumns and/or sidebars (so we can have a list 'o links to the right of the text)
 
 
 
* A way to do doublecolumns and/or sidebars (so we can have a list 'o links to the right of the text)
 
**Double columns are only natively supported by Netscape. However they could be done by using tables. [[chuckr30]]
 
 
 
** Maybe, if such sidebars could be created ''automatically'' and for ''all'' articles. But what's wrong with having the links at the bottom of the page? If that's reasonably acceptable, why go through the confusion of having links in a sidebar? --[[LMS]]
Line 60 ⟶ 56:
 
* A link to [[How does one edit a page/Quick reference]] from the editing page, to avoid me having to dive through the [[FAQ]] every time I can't remember a special character -- DrBob
 
 
 
Line 66 ⟶ 61:
 
**Absolutely! The first thing I want to do if i go to Wikipedia is looking for some word. The way it is now, I always have to scroll down (yeah, my window is small...)
 
 
 
*** Maybe make its placement a user preference: top, bottom, or both? -- [[Gimbo]]
 
 
****I think both would be best: for example, take a look at the page generated by a succesful Google search, such as http://www.google.com/search?q=wikipedia