Content deleted Content added
Johnbyrnes (talk | contribs) |
Johnbyrnes (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4:
Due to the ability of the system to 'read people's thoughts', it is potentially in violation of privacy laws such as the [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution]]. Of particular note is radio host [[Alex Jones (radio host)|Alex Jones']] broadcast which emphasises the controversial nature of the program.<ref>YouTube. "Alex Reviews DHS's FAST: The Machine That Reads "Malintent Minds" on The Alex Jones Show". Available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huj2ntG9MOY. Retrieved 2010-03-12</ref>
As demonstrated by the GAO Report on TSA’s programs, which include Future Attribute Screening Technology (FAST), SPOT, VIPER, etc. these methods that use of adrenaline-driven aggression indicators, i.e. Deception Detection or its derivative microexpressions '''do''' identify those with criminal intent to smuggle; they '''do not''' identify the terrorist or perpetrator of murder/suicide. Only with intent-driven Cognitive Aggression indicators can one identify the terrorist.
Now controversial full-body scanners along with "Enhanced Patdown" are being implemented in airports, however, smugglers and terrorist overseas are now placing their contraband within their body-cavities. It is, therefore, reasonable to ask TSA, “What’s next?” Learn more http://blog.AggressionManagement.com <references />
| |||