Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/November 2006: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Subst: {{unsigned}} (& regularise templates)
SporkBot (talk | contribs)
m Repair or remove missing or deleted templates
Line 622:
all seem viable[[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] 11:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
**Sounds reasonable. Another possible axis to split on would be gallops vs steeples vs trotting and pacing, but I think I prefer your suggestion. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 05:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC) (who'll be watching [[Melbourne Cup|the big race]] tomorrow afternoon)
*For naming consistency, those should be {{cl|Horse race stubs}}, {{cl|Racehorse stubs}} and {{cl|horse racing biography stubs}}. [[User:Alai|Alai]] 06:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>