Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Scope etc.: + |
→Scope etc.: reply |
||
Line 397:
::It's the second time I've seen such a mistake. I'll report the mistake to the corresponding working group of the WCAG like I did last time, and start a discussion at their mailing list. Yours, [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 10:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
:::If they update their stance, fine. But I follow [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] so would believe the [[World Wide Web Consortium]] over some editor I know nothing about (no offense). [[User:Rambo's Revenge|<b><font color="#E32636">Rambo's Revenge</font></b>]] [[User talk:Rambo's Revenge|<small><b><font color="#FFA500">(talk)</font></b></small>]] 15:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
::::We're following W3C's [[WCAG]] approach, for sure. But it is not supposed to be applied blindly by someone who is not familiar with the process. We're not writing an article here, we're deciding our site-wide guidelines.
::::I've just send you an e-mail with the copy of the previous exchange I had with the WCAG working group, to show you how it works there.
::::As for the sudden reply at the FL discussion: I'm sorry, I didn't expected the expert to reply that quickly. As for the details of this discussion, it is best to keep them here as my detailed reply will be fairly complex for non-technical users. Yours, [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 16:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
| |||