Content deleted Content added
→Multithreading vs SMT?: Questions |
→Proposed renaming: Disregard my previous comment |
||
Line 38:
: I don't think that there is a need for multithreading to be a disambiguation page, and I am not sure how you concluded that disambiguation is needed. I notice that there is a hatnote that mentions threads, but I cannot see how you can confuse a thread with multithreading. Its like confusing ''instruction'' with ''superscalar''. [[User:Rilak|Rilak]] ([[User talk:Rilak|talk]]) 06:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
:: Actually, disregard the above comment, I just remembered that the term multithreading is used in in the context of software. What I object to is the proposed title. I think it makes it a bit difficult to determine quickly that it is about multithreading as "multithreading" is not at the front. I propose that "Multithreading (computer architecture)" be used instead. I considered "Multithreading (computer hardware)", but I think it is not appropriate as it implies that the article is about physical realizations of multithreading and not the technique and theory. [[User:Rilak|Rilak]] ([[User talk:Rilak|talk]]) 07:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
| |||