Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→"Good" example: new section |
→Scope etc.: to keep an easy track of the answer |
||
Line 400:
::::I've just send you an e-mail with the copy of the previous exchange I had with the WCAG working group, to show you how it works there.
::::As for the sudden reply at the FL discussion: I'm sorry, I didn't expected the expert to reply that quickly. As for the details of this discussion, it is best to keep them here as my detailed reply will be fairly complex for non-technical users. Yours, [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 16:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
:::::This guideline has it wrong, and it's a known fact to accessibility experts. See, there are several application methodology for WCAG 2.0. [[Section 508]] has [http://webaim.org/standards/508/checklist WebAIM section 508 checklist], for example. And about this particular issue, [[WebAIM]] explicitely says that [http://webaim.org/techniques/tables/data#scope "The scope attribute should be used on simple data tables"]. The ITAA guideline [http://www.dhs.state.il.us/IITAA/IITAAWebImplementationGuidelines.html#web11.1 says the same]. And [http://www.telono.com/en/services/accessibility/guidelines other application methodologies around the world], like Euracert and the French RGAA says the same. They all agree that W3C made a slight mistake here, and this mistake is likely to be fixed in later versions of the WCAG 2.0 guideline. [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 17:59, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
== "Good" example ==
| |||