Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →"Good" example: no French typo here :p |
|||
Line 407:
:Sure, the captions there can be improved. It wasn't the point of the section, so I didn't pay too much attention to it. I'd say "Vasiliy Kaptyukh achievements representing {{t|URS}}" would be fitting. What do you say?
:{{t|URS}} has no link and the alt text is blank. Since the useful information follows the icon flag, there is no loss of information here. This template is compliant to accessibility guidelines. Thanks for your interest in these matters. :-) Yours, [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 18:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
::Could I make a suggestion? If you wish to create tutorials as part of the MOS, please try to ensure they themselves meet the MOS? "Three headers are red aloud. The first and the third are correct and expected. But "Representing Soviet Union" doesn't apply to this part of the table anymore and a machine doesn't have any hint to understand it." is not great. I guess "red aloud" should be "read aloud" and we avoid contractions throughout. It's not clear what you mean by "doesn't have any hint to understand it" either. I guess, before suggesting this is used mainstream, it's copyedited and reviewed. Saying it's not the point of the section really misses the point. If you want people to comply with the MOS, make the MOS and its tutorials comply with the MOS. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 18:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
| |||