Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:12, 8 November 2010

Revision as of 19:14, 8 November 2010

Line 419:

:::::I can ask them any question you want, any accessibility issue you want to raise. And I'll get back at you with their answer.

:::::You can also contact [[WebAIM]] guys, as what was did concerning alt text and what led to he change needed. See, there was a huge issue with [[WP:ALT]], where a few users were claiming to be right against all. And the solution was the expert: he was the only one to have enough trust so that users will follow his advice. WP:ALT was then rewritten, and is now pretty good. Just want to point out that experts can bring something else than that Essjay controversy.

:::::As for the need of an expert: there[[WCAG]] are2.0 consists of 72 A level criteria, 28 AA level criteria and 36 AAA level criteria. And more than 300 techniques are related to them. Perhaps you can read it all in a few days, and understand it perfectly. Which would mean that you are a genius. I'm certainly not capable of that. That's why I need to be in contact with an expert. I'm doing my best, I'm using accurate sources, but I still need an expert to ensure I'm doing the right thing. Hope that makes it clearer. Yours, [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 19:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)