Revision as of 15:21, 17 November 2010 edit Ipsign (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,328 edits →JavaLobby reference: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:42, 18 November 2010 edit undo Ipsign (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,328 edits →JavaLobby reference Next edit →
Line 5: IMHO [http://www.javalobby.org/articles/thinking-in-java/ this review] is really questionable, at least because it has an obviously affiliate link to Amazon, and therefore is inherently biased (it also provides an incentive to write a review merely to get affiliate revenues, which makes it ineligible for [[WP:N]] purposes). I'm going to remove it unless explanation why it can/should be considered reliable is provided. [[User:Ipsign\|Ipsign]] ([[User talk:Ipsign\|talk]]) 15:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC) Per comment of [[User:AQFK]] on [[Wikipedia:Reliable Sources/Noticeboard]], this review is a user-submitted one to a Web2.0 site w/o editorial oversight and therefore doesn't qualify as [[WP:RS]]. Accordingly, I will remove it. [[User:Ipsign\|Ipsign]] ([[User talk:Ipsign\|talk]]) 06:42, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Thinking in Java: Difference between revisions