Talk:Computer-assisted language learning: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
GroovyGuzi (talk | contribs)
GroovyGuzi (talk | contribs)
Line 40:
::I agree and I've reverted the changes. It's not acceptable to have sections that are obviously incomplete and written as such. [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 04:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 
OK, will do.Sorry! Will draft the complete article offline first. The article is in desperate need of revision. It contains inaccuracies, blatant advertising (Rosetta Stone) and is not a reflection of the current state of CALL. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 08:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
Looking at the individual sections once again, I think it is possible to correct them and tidy them up one by one, without making a mess of the article as a whole. I think that the section on problems and crticisms is one that should be targeted for immediate revision. It's too slanted. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]]