Content deleted Content added
Hervegirod (talk | contribs) |
→Possible Fallacy in Feature comparison: compare what? |
||
Line 370:
:::AWT is not part of Java. AWT is built upon Java (the language). The hard-wiring you refer to is the AWT components using JNI. That does ''not'' make AWT or events part of ''the Java programming language'' [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 13:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
:::: Ahem you can't have Java without AWT. All widgets events handling is done per AWT, at the core Java platform level. Whether you use AWT or another graphic toolkit. [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] ([[User talk:Hervegirod|talk]]) 15:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
::::: It would be a strange decision to compare just the keywords in a language with those in another in a ''feature'' comparison. If the language designers chose to reserve another keyword, or put it into one of the basic libraries, is an almost arbitrary choice for many features. Maybe what some of you want is a comparative listing of the two sets of reserved keywords, while others want a functional comparison about what it's like to develop software in the two languages. I think the second will be more the interesting article, if both were produced. --[[User:Nigelj|Nigelj]] ([[User talk:Nigelj|talk]]) 16:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
| |||