Content deleted Content added
Reformat for readability |
|||
Line 118:
Seems to me that this article is more for those who want to find an alternative to ORM rather than to those who want to know more. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/77.12.17.244|77.12.17.244]] ([[User talk:77.12.17.244|talk]]) 07:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
To Dougluce - I think you need better sources than that, "self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis,
personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources."
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources
To 86.30.37.126 - ('no citation is needed, it's an inherently true statement, eg 'an alternative wearing shoes is going barefoot')
"An alternative to implementing ORM is use of the native procedural languages provided with every major database on the market. "
This need a source - however 'inherently true' you see it. [[User:Williajm|Williajm]] ([[User talk:Williajm|talk]]) 23:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||