Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failure-oblivious computing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Beeblebrox (talk | contribs) →Failure-oblivious computing: if you say so |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18:
*As noted above, sources exist (as the people who expended the effort to look for them found) discussing this within the umbrella topic of [[self-healing software system]]s or [[software self-healing]]. Since we don't have that yet, our coverage of computing subjects being superficial and poor here just as elsewhere, we cannot merge yet. So we '''keep''', since this is valid content under a valid sub-topic title with a useful cited source. There's no sense in throwing this away. It's content that can be built upon. And our coverage of computing certainly needs building. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 15:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
:Well, we'll have to agree to disagree on that point. In my opinion our coverage of computing contains many articles that are of no use whatsoever to a general audience and are more like a directory of obscure terminology than encyclopedic content. This article being an example of such. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 20:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
::Great. Another person who thinks to know what is useful for a general audience. Wikipedia, an encyclopedia for everyone. :( [[User:Nageh|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh|talk]]) 20:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
| |||