Revision as of 20:37, 19 January 2011 edit Nageh (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 6,862 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:11, 19 January 2011 edit undo Victor falk (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 13,988 edits →Failure-oblivious computing: '''Keep''' per WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NOEFFORT and WP:IDONTKNOWIT. Numerous sources show it's a notable computing concept. Deleting obscure but encyclopedic st Next edit →
Line 20: ::Great. Another person who thinks to know what is useful for a general audience. Wikipedia, an encyclopedia for everyone. :( [[User:Nageh\|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh\|talk]]) 20:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC) ::PS: Read the lengthy discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:Scientific_citation_guidelines/Archive_2#Pillar_one_reminder]] including the section before and after it at the current [[Wikipedia_talk:Scientific_citation_guidelines\|discussion page]]. Thanks for your consideration. [[User:Nageh\|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh\|talk]]) 20:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC) '''Keep''' per [[WP:NOTCLEANUP]], [[WP:NOEFFORT]] and [[WP:IDONTKNOWIT]]. Numerous sources show it's a notable computing concept. Deleting obscure but encyclopedic stuff is hardly a way to encourage people with special knowledge to edit wikipedia. <sup><small><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/Victor_falk\|''walk'']]</font></small></sup> <font color="green">[[user:victor falk\|''victor falk'']]</font><sup><small> <font color="green">[[user_talk:victor falk\|''talk'']]</font></small></sup> 23:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failure-oblivious computing: Difference between revisions