Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failure-oblivious computing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Beeblebrox (talk | contribs) →Failure-oblivious computing: this is why afd sucks |
Beeblebrox (talk | contribs) →Failure-oblivious computing: look at the diffs |
||
Line 21:
::PS: Read the lengthy discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:Scientific_citation_guidelines/Archive_2#Pillar_one_reminder]] including the section before and after it at the current [[Wikipedia_talk:Scientific_citation_guidelines|discussion page]]. Thanks for your consideration. [[User:Nageh|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh|talk]]) 20:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:NOTCLEANUP]], [[WP:NOEFFORT]] and [[WP:IDONTKNOWIT]]. Numerous sources show it's a notable computing concept. Deleting obscure but encyclopedic stuff is hardly a way to encourage people with special knowledge to edit wikipedia. <sup><small><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/Victor_falk|''walk'']]</font></small></sup> <font color="green">[[user:victor falk|''victor falk'']]</font><sup><small> <font color="green">[[user_talk:victor falk|''talk'']]</font></small></sup> 23:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
*This is a perfect example if what is wrong with afd. Some people do a couple of google searches and cnoclude based on that that the topic is notable. Policies are slung around, a mild personal attack is made on the nominator, and the article.... still sucks balls and hasn't been edited a single time in the 16 days since being nominated, and hasn't been edited in any substantive way since the PROD was declined three months ago There actually hasn't been a substantive edit that actually improved this article in any meaningful way since it was created nearly six years ago. Then :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Failure-oblivious_computing&diff=prev&oldid=17636211] Now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Failure-oblivious_computing&diff=405820241&oldid=405815689] If it is so obvious to all of you how easy it would be to fix the article how come nobody is willing to do it? If it can be fixed, fix it and I'll happily concede the point. I suppose it's easier to say I'm a lazy ignoramus because I'm not a computer geek. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 23:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
| |||