Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 107:
===The Shakespeare authorship question engenders a disproportionate number of repetitious noticeboard discussions increasing in frequency and intensity===
Below are some examples, less than 20% of the total over the years. In addition, several editors and administrators, such as [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]], [[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]], and [[User:Verbal|Verbal]] hosted [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EdJohnston/Archive_16#Clarification discussions] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joshua_P._Schroeder&oldid=355643468#Incivility_of_Nishidani.2C_Reedy.2C_et_al their] talk [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joshua_P._Schroeder&oldid=355643468#RS_opinion_needed pages] and intervened on article talk pages to try to mediate the problems between disputants, all to no avail. Editors or administrators who get dragged into the topic never return once they're able to escape.
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_33#Shakespeare_Fellowship 5/1/2009] [[WP:RS/N]] discussion on [[Shakespeare Fellowship]] (Oxfordian) materials as [[WP:RS]] (48kb). Result: no.
| |||