Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 705:
With pages like these, and in a medium such as the English Wikipedia, some conflict is inevitable, and grown-up ways need to be found to manage it impartially. In my view, that has not been happening recently. </br>
[[User:Moonraker2|Moonraker2]] ([[User talk:Moonraker2|talk]]) 08:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
==Evidence presented by Nishidani ==
===Self-indictment, with a few clumsy sobstory excuses.===
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#Arbcom_submission_here.2C_since_it_is_far_too_long.2C_and_I_am_far_too_exhausted_to_waste_my_last_weeks_on_vacation_reading_thousands_of_diffs I've placed my evidence, also against myself, on my own talk page here] since, despite struggling for a week, I cannot bring myself to do what is required of me, and mount a case against anyone. I prefer to just give the thinnest of sketches as to how I perceived things over the past 11 months. I apologize to arbitration. My knowledge of rules, my grasp of diff theory, everything is empirical, and in my experience one very rarely gets a comprehensive picture of diffs, unless someone is willing to riff back and forward for context, or read whole archives, which would be a form of cruelty here.[[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 06:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
==Evidence presented by {your user name}==
| |||