[[User:68.167.249.197|68.167.249.197]] 23:44, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC): I'd suggest that it is standard practice to have the main article body for CORBA/Common object request broker architecture to be under the fully expanded version of the name (cf. [[Remote procedure call]]/[[Remote procedure call|RPC]], and [[File transfer protocol]]/[[File Transfer Protocol|FTP]] to name two examples).
:That's right! [[User:I am sexy|I am sexy]] 23:46, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
priyam i love u
:I would argue that [[File transfer protocol]] should be moved to FTP, though Remote procedure call should stay as it is. This is because there is not just one file transfer protocol. Having a page title like "File transfer protocol" or "Common object request broker architecture" implies that there is more than one - for example - "a file transfer protocol is..." or "a common object request broker architecture", whilst "an FTP" or "a CORBA" is less appropriate. [[User:Dysprosia|Dysprosia]] 06:40, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
::[[User:68.167.249.2|68.167.249.2]] 09:02, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC): Admittedly "file transfer protocol" can be generically used, but I disagree about "common object request broker architecture" which has established itself as a specific standard. That is emphasized outside of wikipedia by capitalizing all the words. Additional examples, like OSI, DNS, SNMP, LAN, FDDI, SMTP, ICMP, RARP all redirect to the full words, though HTTP doesn't.
== an exception proving the rule; disambig COBRA and CORBA ==
