Revision as of 08:24, 7 February 2011 edit Tea2min (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 21,975 edits m Reverted 3 edits by 111.93.35.130 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by SineBot. (TW) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:25, 7 February 2011 edit undo Tea2min (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 21,975 edits m Revert to last revision by Jwillemsen Next edit →
Line 62: ==The criticisms and success sections== prateek is ganduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/111.93.35.130\|111.93.35.130]] ([[User talk:111.93.35.130\|talk]]) 05:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> The language of these sections seems more like an internet flame war than an encyclopedia entry. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages\|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/194.25.80.243\|194.25.80.243]] ([[User talk:194.25.80.243\|talk]]) 09:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> :I agree, these two sections are full of contradictory statements. A neutral reader will end it up wondering if CORBA was really successful or a real failure at all. Also found the section for Success lacking for not citing enough references. ([[User:SirGalahad\|SirGalahad]] 21:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC))

Talk:Common Object Request Broker Architecture: Difference between revisions