Content deleted Content added
Goodwillein (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 49:
::Additionally, there are many 'pieces of work' that can be referenced, their published papers in peer reviewed journals and the IOS book as required (see [[WP:UNDUE|this fundamental policy]]). <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Goodwillein|Goodwillein]] ([[User talk:Goodwillein|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Goodwillein|contribs]]) 18:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Concerning peer-reviewed publications, I find only a few papers in minor journals such as Neural Processing Letters and BMC Neuroscience, and even those have not been cited by anybody except Aur and Jog. I have some respect for Mandar Jog due to the very interesting work he did when he was in Ann Graybiel's lab, but I see no evidence that this particular work has garnered any attention except from the people who are doing it. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 18:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Your discussion regarding authors is not relevant. Have you read their book before deleting what I inserted? Concerning peer-reviewed publications and high ISI ranking journals in biomedical field you should read http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v8/n2/full/nmeth0211-104.html. I feel that would be fair to reference in neural coding all current trends in the field (Correlation coding, Independent-spike coding, Phase-of-firing code, Population coding, Rate coding, Sparse coding, Temporal coding and NeuroElectroDynamics)and see what the future holds for any of them.
| |||