Revision as of 08:54, 17 February 2011 edit Paddy3118 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 843 edits →Does Haskell allow functions as keys in a map?: Python might, for a different imterpretation of equals. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:01, 17 February 2011 edit undo Ruud Koot (talk \| contribs) 31,416 edits →Does Haskell allow functions as keys in a map?: re Next edit →
Line 292: * Hope that the consensus goes your way. - Hardly rigourous but very human. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 08:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC) : The most commons definition you'll find in the literature is that functions can be passed as arguments (higher-order functions, downwards funarg problem) and returned and stored as values (upwards funarg problem). : Now I've thought about it bit more, related to the your question is the function equality (intentional equality vs. extensional equality vs. ad-hod equality). Its not directly related to first-classness, but as you raised it in this context it might be useful to discuss in the article. —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 10:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Talk:First-class function: Difference between revisions